Cheque Bounce Lawyers in Kerala

A dishonoured cheque is not merely a financial inconvenience — it is a criminal offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, carrying a potential punishment of up to two years imprisonment and a fine that can extend to twice the cheque amount. Whether you are the payee holding a bounced cheque or the drawer facing a complaint, expert legal representation is essential to protect your interests.

VakeelKerala.com offers access to advocates experienced in cheque bounce proceedings across Kerala’s Magistrate Courts. Our lawyers handle the entire process — from drafting and dispatching the mandatory legal notice within the statutory timeframe to filing complaints, presenting evidence, cross-examining witnesses, and negotiating settlements.

How Our Cheque Bounce Lawyers Help You

Frequently Asked Questions — Cheque Bounce Lawyers

What should I do when a cheque bounces?

Send a legal demand notice to the drawer within 30 days of receiving the bank’s return memo. If the drawer fails to pay within 15 days of receiving the notice, file a criminal complaint within 30 days thereafter.

Up to two years imprisonment and/or a fine up to twice the cheque amount. Courts can also order the accused to pay compensation to the complainant.

Yes. Sending a written demand notice within 30 days of cheque dishonour is a mandatory prerequisite. Without it, the complaint is not maintainable.

Yes. The accused can pay the cheque amount plus interest at any stage, and the case can be compounded with court permission. Mediated settlements are common and encouraged.

The payee of the cheque or the holder in due course can file the complaint. Companies can file through an authorised representative with a proper board resolution.

The complaint must be filed within 30 days after the 15-day notice period expires without payment. Extensions may be granted by the court for sufficient cause.

Yes. Cheque bounce is a bailable offence, and the accused is generally granted bail by the court. However, conditions may be imposed.

The accused often raises this defence. However, courts have held that once a cheque is issued and presented, the presumption is that it was for a legally enforceable debt. The burden shifts to the accused to prove otherwise.